Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Guthrie Ferguson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 06:48, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Andrew Guthrie Ferguson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Andrew Guthrie Ferguson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am a little unsure with this one, but on the balance of things think it fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:04, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

• Weak keep per WP:NAUTHOR. Author of two notable books—reviews follow. Also, here's his CV for convenience. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 18:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Why Jury Duty Matters (reviews: [1]; [2]; [3])
  • The Rise of Big Data Policing (reviews: doi:10.3798/tia.1937-0237.1926; [4]).
    • Changed to regular old keep per David Eppstein's !vote below. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 18:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 18:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

• Weak keep as the individual appears to have been asked to comment on legal issues by several major media outlets. But I definitely don't feel strongly if others disagree as I could see a lot of law professors meeting this criteria...DocFreeman24 (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

• Weak keep Agree with above users. BlueD954 (talk) 04:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:AUTHOR. I added to the article nine published reviews of one book and four of the other, including the five already listed by AleatoryPonderings. I think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.