Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bristol

This page is for discussing:

  • the project, its aims, achievements and directions
  • general page style and layout issues
  • content issues which affect several pages

It is not intended for:

  • specific page content issues
  • as a substitute for the talk pages of individual articles, including that of the main Bristol article

However, you may post alerts and links to such conversations here.

Bristol / Hanover Wiki Meetup

edit

It's been a long time since Bristol Wikimedians have held an in-person meetup. I have arranged one for Saturday 16th September and it's a special occasion because a delegation of Wikimedians from Bristol's twin city of Hanover will be present. Come along if you want to meet other experienced wiki contributors, if you want to chat to our German friends, or even if you are a wiki newcomer and want to find out more about the Wikimedia projects. See more details and please sign up on the meta page. MartinPoulter (talk) 08:33, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for 2006–07 Bristol Rovers F.C. season

edit

2006–07 Bristol Rovers F.C. season has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

John James (businessman and philanthropist)

edit

Hello. I have submitted a draft for review of an article about John James, the man who owned Broadmead Wireless Group and who funded the Bristol Old Folk Festival for many years, amongst many other things. Any comments would be welcome, as I've never written a wikipedia article before. There's plenty more I could add. Jjarchivist (talk) 10:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Bristol Old Vic

edit

Bristol Old Vic has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Concorde

edit

Concorde has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for River Avon, Bristol

edit

River Avon, Bristol has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:22, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for University of Bristol

edit

University of Bristol has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)Reply